A statutory demand is a claim under Section 289 of the Companies Act 1993. Failing to comply with a statutory demand or applying to set it aside within the specified timeframes will result in your company being deemed to be insolvent and liquidation may follow.
A company is insolvent if it is unable to pay its debts when they fall due.
Non-compliance with a statutory demand served on your company allows the creditor that served the statutory demand to apply to the High Court to appoint a liquidator. The most common basis for a company in New Zealand to be placed into liquidation by the High Court is from failure to comply with a statutory demand.
If you receive a Statutory Demand you need to act quickly. You can either pay the specified sum, enter into some form of compromise to pay the debt, or offer up some form of security to the satisfaction of the creditor.
If the debt is disputed you must apply under Section 290 to have the debt set aside. You will need to engage a lawyer.
The court may grant an application to set aside a statutory demand if it is satisfied that
(a) there is a substantial dispute whether or not the debt is owing or is due; or
(b) the company appears to have a counterclaim, set-off, or cross-demand and the amount specified in the demand less the amount of the counterclaim, set-off, or cross-demand is less than the prescribed amount; or
(c) the demand ought to be set aside on other grounds.
If no action is taken, nor a liquidator appointed voluntarily (by the shareholders) before the service of the Winding Up Proceeding, the Winding Up Application hearing takes place and if the High Court is satisfied that the company should be wound up, an order for the Company to be wound up is made and the Court appoints a liquidator. A liquidator is nominated by the applicant creditor and provides a consent to act prior to the hearing.
If your company does not satisfy the solvency test and is risking trading insolvently then the shareholders of the company can voluntarily appoint a liquidator so long as the appointment occurs before the service of a winding up application (which often closely follows the expiry of the statutory demand).
Your company may be closed by the liquidator or the business sold. You can save your company from facing Court liquidation proceedings with the following options:
• Voluntary liquidation (if liquidation is inevitable)
• Voluntary Administration
• Company Compromise – Part XIV Companies Act 1993
• Debt Restructuring and a workout
• Advice on your options early on
Liquidation may be inevitable and a way out of a downward spiral. Speak to an a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner. It may not mean losing your business. Some companies advance liquidation voluntarily in order to restructure.
For advice on statutory demands, liquidation, hive down, voluntary administration or compromise contact our team at McDonald Vague.
If you need a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner to consent to act as liquidator on an upcoming court liquidation or to manage a voluntary liquidation, Boris, Iain, Colin, Keaton or Peri are pleased to assist.
It’s important to address disputed debt as soon as possible. This will more likely lead to a positive outcome and enable you to rescue your business relationship.
You cannot recover a debt via a statutory demand if the debt is disputed. And, of course, you need cash to continue to operate, so it’s important to find a solution quickly.
Below, we outline the three steps to settling disputed debt:
Of course, the best way to minimise disputed debt is to avoid the situation where disputes can arise in the first place. Many disputes can be avoided by good record keeping. Clear terms of trade and customer credit limits that are enforced will go a long way to ensuring you’re never put in a difficult situation again.
Terms of trade should be reviewed periodically (at least once a year) to ensure they’re still meeting your current needs. You may wish to amend your payment terms, default provisions and PPSR guidelines. You might also consider insisting on taking personal guarantees. The ability to register a security in your supplies provides you remedies in the event of failure of your customer.
Chasing disputed debt through the courts can be a costly process, sometimes far outweighing the benefits of retrieving your money. Dragging a customer through court will also irreparably harm your relationship with them. The best (and usually most cost-effective) solution may be to reach an informal debt settlement or compromise with your customer.
When offering a settlement, consider the customer’s grievance with the debt, as well as their ability to pay. What solution can you offer that ensures both parties come out satisfied?
You may wish to seek advice from a professional firm specialising in business debt settlement, such as McDonald Vague. We can help advise you on a settlement that will ensure the best possible outcome.
If you’re not able to reach an agreement about the dispute, your next recourse is to undertake legal proceedings against the debtor. Depending on the amount being contested, you have different options:
Disputes Tribunal: for disputes up to $15,000 (or $20,000 if both parties agree to extend the jurisdiction). Filing fees for the Tribunal are on the low side and both parties represent themselves, making this a cost-effective solution if legal proceedings are required. An order or agreed settlement made by the Tribunal referee is enforced against the debtor in the same way a District Court order would be.
District Court/High Court: The District Court will deal with claims up to $200,000, and any claim higher than this will go through the High Court. Applications for proceedings at these courts are similar, and both require more expert skills, time, and research than the proceedings for the Disputes Tribunal. We recommend you seek out legal advice before issuing proceedings in the District or High Court.
If you are struggling with disputed debts contact us now.
As a small business owner, pursuing outstanding debts can be a painful process. You don’t want to be seen as the “bad guy”, but at the same time, you rely on debtors paying on time in order to service your own cash flow, and if a debtor defaults, your business suffers.
Unfortunately, the creditor who protests the loudest is likely to be paid first. This means if you want to see your money soon, you’ll need to get vocal with your debtor. In this article, we have a look at the small business debt recovery process and suggest ways you can make the debt collection process a little easier for all parties involved.
If you have a debt owing, and your usual debt recovery process (email reminder, follow-up phone call, compounding, etc) hasn’t resulted in payment, legally you have three tools in your arsenal you can employ.
For a fee, your lawyer will draft up a letter outlining your debtors legal obligations and the repercussions of not paying the debt within a certain timeframe. Often, simply receiving a letter on a lawyer’s letterhead will be enough to convince a debtor to move your debt to their top priority. This can be a good first step as it is cheaper than engaging a lawyer for legal action.
You can assign small business debt collection to an agency. They will pursue the business on your behalf and attempt to recover your debt. This is a good option if communications between you and the debtor have broken down.
The agency will establish contact with your debtor via mail and telephone, and may also visit in person to collect on the debt. They will also register the default against your debtor, which will remain on their credit record for up to five years. Debt collection agencies settle the majority of claims without legal proceedings, but if required, can also act on your behalf to sue the debtor to recover money owing.
If you suspect the company owing you money may be insolvent, and the debt is not in dispute, you can have your lawyer issue a statutory demand to recover your money. As we outline in our Statutory demands article, you may be able to recover the outstanding debt, interest owing on the debt, and legal costs associated with small business debt collection.
A statutory demand should ideally come from a lawyer you’ve hired, rather than from yourself or a debt collection agency. Once issued, the debtor has 15 days to pay the amount claimed. If they neglect to do this, you can apply to place their company into liquidation.
Seeking legal action for small business debt collection should not be taken lightly, and it’s important to ensure the debt is not in dispute before issuing a statutory demand.
If you are struggling to manage the debt in your company contact us now.
Dealing with non-payers can be like ‘pulling teeth’. Cash, however, is the lifeblood of business and most business owners cannot afford to sit back and not take action. We cover our top tips for taking control of your debtors...
The good news is that you can take steps (with Court proceedings often a last resort) to improve your cash flow and disincentivise your clients from treating you like a bank. We all know court can be an expensive and time consuming process and can spell the end of a business relationship. A formal demand can also damage your relationship with your customer and, if you suspect insolvency, potentially place you in a difficult position with the liquidator seeking to ‘claw back’ that payment down the track.
In this article we cover our top tips for taking control of your debtors: putting in place credit control processes, using your debt collection processes, resolving disputes through the relevant Court/Tribunal. We also set out the liquidation (companies) and bankruptcy (individuals) processes.
When you are deciding whether to start a new business relationship, you should make an informed decision. If you are going to be supplying goods or services on credit, you should have the customer complete a credit application form and provide a copy of your terms of trade. You should also consider running a credit check and speaking to the customer’s credit references.
Once in a business relationship, you should set and enforce customer credit limits and have clear terms of trade in place that include (amongst other things) payment terms and default provisions in the event of non payment. If your terms include PPSR provisions entitling you to register a security interest on the PPSR then do it. Also consider obtaining personal guarantees.
Including a clause in your terms of trade allowing you to charge interest on overdue invoices (and adding interest to overdue invoices) will encourage customers to pay on time. It is also a good idea to include a term allowing you to pass on debt collection fees and/or legal costs you incur to your customer, in the event of non-payment.
Actively monitor your debtors and take steps when payments are missed. This makes it harder for your debtors to ignore you, which increases your chance of being paid.
It is important that you act in accordance with your terms of trade, rely on your credit policies (such as stop credit limits), and have a clear record of treating all customers in the same way. By having robust credit control processes, you help protect your business from exposure to bad debts. If you do not take any steps until you suspect that a customer is insolvent, if that customer company later faces liquidation/bankruptcy and your debt was paid in the period leading up to liquidation, there is a risk the liquidator/assignee may have the ability to claw back that payment.
If your internal debt collection process has not resulted in payment, you should consider sending the debt to your lawyers or a debt collection agency. Because this increases the “seriousness” of the unpaid debt, referring the debt to an independent party for collection will be successful even though your internal processes have not resulted in payment.
Often, a letter of demand on your solicitors’ letterhead or a visit from a debt collection agent will prompt payment. If there is a dispute relating to the debt, contact from your lawyer or debt collection agent may elicit a response, even if the debtor has been ignoring you.
Once you have engaged your lawyers / a debt collection agent, you can leave them to deal with the communications and legal process (although some input from you will still be required). This means that you can spend your time adding value to your business instead of following up late payers.
There is a cost associated with engaging outside help to recover your debt. Lawyers generally charge for work undertaken whereas debt collectors generally charge a fee based on a percentage of the debt owing. Some debt collection agencies work on a success fee basis, that is, no fee if no reward. There are benefits and drawbacks to both approaches so you will need to decide which option is best for you in relation to the debt in question.
If you want to recover these outside legal / debt recovery costs, you need to ensure there is provision for passing on these costs included in your terms of trade.
Dealing with a disputed debt is not enjoyable. However, if your customer has a genuine concern / grievance, they are unlikely to pay you until the debt is resolved. In addition, the earlier the dispute is addressed, the more likely you are to save your business relationship.
The best “self help” remedy for a disputed debt is to reach a compromise or informal settlement. This is also generally the most cost effective option, in the long run.
If the dispute cannot be resolved, you will need to consider issuing legal proceedings. Which Court or Tribunal is the most appropriate will depend on the amount owing to you.
Disputes Tribunal – up to $30,000
If there is a dispute and the debt up to $30,000 then a claim can be filed in the Disputes Tribunal. The Disputes Tribunal only has jurisdiction to deal with disputed debts – it is not for obtaining judgment on undisputed debts. The filing fees in the Disputes Tribunal are low and solicitors cannot represent you at the hearing, which also keeps costs down. At the hearing, the referee will make an order or approve an agreed settlement. Once the order is made, it can be enforced against the debtor in the same way that a District Court judgment could.
District Court - up to $350,000 / High Court - $350,000 or more
If the debt is less than $350,000, the claim will fall within the jurisdiction of the District Court. If the debt is greater than $350,000, the claim falls within jurisdiction of the High Court. While there are some differences, the processes followed in the District Court and the High Court are similar.
The District Court and High Court can be used to resolve claims over disputed debts. This is done by issuing ordinary proceedings. These applications are more complex, costly, and time consuming than claims in the Disputes Tribunal. For this reason, we recommend that you obtain legal advice before issuing proceedings in the District Court or High Court.
Once judgment has been obtained, it can be enforced.
If the debt is owed by a company and there is no dispute but payment is not forthcoming, you can issue a statutory demand demanding payment. If the customer takes no steps to compromise, or pay, or offer some form of security, then following the expiry of 15 working days after the service of that statutory demand, winding up proceedings can be advanced within the next 30 working days.
Unless the company is genuinely insolvent, service of a statutory demand or a bankruptcy notice will often lead to payment (or an arrangement for payment). For a company that is genuinely insolvent, it will inevitably lead to liquidation (company) either by a company creditor or by the company’s shareholders. In our experience, debts generally continue to mount while insolvent companies are left to their own devices. This means that, the longer the period of insolvency, the less creditors are likely to recover. During the liquidation process you will need to gain the consent of a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner at an insolvency/recovery specialist firm such as McDonald Vague Limited to consent to act as liquidators of the company. If you want to choose the company’s liquidators, the liquidators’ consent to act needs to be with the Court before the liquidation order is made.
The consent of an Licensed Insolvency Practitioner, who will have the requisite skills and experience necessary to carry out the liquidation and who has a governing body they report to, is now a requirement.
If the liquidator does not realise a recovery for creditors (i.e. there are no realisable assets before or after taking into account secured and preferential claims) or is only able to realise a partial recovery for creditors, the only recovery option still available may be to pursue a personal guarantee, if this was gained during the business relationship or as part of a compromise or settlement.
Claims for payment of undisputed debts against individuals (e.g. sole traders and guarantors) can be made by way of ordinary proceedings or summary judgment proceedings in the District Court or High Court. We recommend that you get legal advice before issuing proceedings against a guarantor.
Once judgment is obtained against an individual, a bankruptcy notice can be issued requiring the debtor to make payment within 10 working days of service. If the bankruptcy notice is not complied with, adjudication proceedings can be brought within 3 months of the bankruptcy notice expiring.
There are, of course, other enforcement options available. These options include financial assessment hearings, attachment orders, warrant to seize property, charging orders, garnishee orders, and
community work. Further information is available from your solicitors or from www.communitylaw.org.nz.
There are a range of steps you can take to minimise your unpaid debtors. If you take positive steps to manage your debtors and to deal with your disputed debts, you increase the likelihood of being paid. While implementing new policies and systems can seem daunting, we are here to help. At McDonald Vague Limited we provide advice and assistance to companies seeking to advance statutory demands and winding up proceedings. We are a firm of Licensed Insolvency Practitioners.
We also advise the recipient of a demand who is seeking to offer a settlement, enter into a compromise, or to advance liquidation by shareholder resolution. We also advise the insolvent individual who seeks to compromise with creditors (Part 5 Proposals) following a formal demand and who may be facing bankruptcy proceedings.We specialise in liquidations, company compromises, restructuring, turnaround (including hive down) and personal proposals. We provide positive solutions to businesses and have a wealth of experience in helping businesses to turn around.
Statutory demands - minimising bad debts is critical for any business
Debt collection is difficult for business owners. Pursuing bad debts early on improves any chance of receiving payment. A creditor that puts the most pressure on a debtor will most likely receive their money before others; however, they need to be conscious of the voidable transaction regime when they are dealing with an insolvent company.
If you are owed a debt and that debt is not in dispute and you suspect the company you have been trading with may be insolvent, you can issue a statutory demand against the company. Depending on your terms of trade, a statutory demand will require the debtor to pay you the outstanding debt, interest on the debt, and the legal costs for issuing the statutory demand. The purpose of a statutory demand is to determine whether the creditor can pay and not that they are liable to pay.
The statutory demand process provides a quick procedure for ensuring payment, or for at least achieving some knowledge on whether payment is possible. This process is intended to be a first step in making an application to put a company into liquidation when a company genuinely cannot pay.
It is important to get the process right and it is advisable to instruct a lawyer who has ethical obligations to ensure the correct steps are taken rather than issuing the demand yourself or a debt collection agency taking responsibility. It is however an abuse of process if the statutory demand option is taken when there is no prospect of the company being placed into liquidation.
The cost of issuing a statutory demand should not be taken lightly. If there is a substantial dispute and the creditor is successful in its challenge, Court costs will be awarded against the creditor. If a creditor gets this process wrong, not only are they out of pocket for additional costs but months may have passed and they are no closer to collecting the debt.
Sections 289 to 291 of the Companies Act 1993 deal with statutory demands.
Before serving a statutory demand it is sensible to ensure that the debt is not in dispute. Sending a formal demand so any dispute can be raised will give you an opportunity to settle the debt without any further action being taken. If, however, the debt is disputed you can file proceedings at the District or High Court and seek judgement on the claim.
Step 1 - Serve a statutory demand for the debt
The demand must be in writing and should be served on the debtor company's registered office. The demand must require the company to pay the debt or to secure the debt or to settle it in some way. If the debtor does not pay the amount claimed within 15 working days, you can apply to put the company into liquidation. This is a powerful tool as it is quite likely the debtor will go to lengths to ensure that other creditors are not aware of liquidation proceedings pending or in progress. The company has 15 working days after being served to comply with the notice.
The statutory demand must specify exactly what amount is owed (and it must be over $1,000). The document specifies when the sum must be paid and provides the alternatives to full payment such as to enter into a compromise (Part XIV of the Companies Act 1993), or otherwise compound, or give a charge over property to secure payment of the debt to the reasonable satisfaction of the debtor, all within 15 working days of the date of service of the demand, or such longer period if the High Court order.
Once a statutory demand is served on the debtor company, the debtor has 10 working days to dispute the debt by filing an application to set aside the demand or pay the debt within 15 working days.
Step 2 - Applying to the Court to place the debtor into liquidation
In the event the debt is neither disputed nor paid, then, on the expiry of 15 working days the debtor is deemed to be insolvent and the creditor can apply to the Court to place the debtor into liquidation. The onus is then on the debtor to satisfy the Court that it is solvent. If the company is unable to pay then a liquidation with a Court appointed liquidator will follow, or, the shareholders within 10 working days of being served have an ability to appoint a liquidator by a shareholder resolution.
A liquidation application can only be issued by certain persons and the order for the appointment can only be made on grounds specified in section 241(4) of the Companies Act 1993. The decision on whether the company is placed into liquidation is at the Court's discretion. The Court may only put a company into liquidation by the appointment of a liquidator if the Court is satisfied that the company is unable to pay its debts, or the company, or the board of the company, has persistently or seriously failed to comply with the Companies Act 1993, or the company does not comply with section 10 (essential requirements), or it is just and equitable that the company be put into liquidation.
The alternatives to paying a statutory demand in full
Compounding means "coming to an agreement with a creditor". The most usual form of compounding is an acceptable offer of payment by instalments. It can also be an offer of a deferred payment or a request to defer filing of a winding up proceedings.
Company Compromise (Part XIV Companies Act 1993) is an agreement between the company and various classes of creditors that give the company an opportunity to survive by avoiding liquidation and trading out of financial difficulty. In order to reach a compromise a majority in number representing 75% in value of each class of creditor voting in favour of such a resolution is required (at a meeting of creditors). Once agreement is reached, all debts are frozen and no creditor can take action against the company during the term of the compromise. The outcome could be creditors are repaid either in full or in part and over time. It is specifically a good option if the business is solid and is in financial difficulty but customers and suppliers are prepared to provide support. Find out more about Company Compromises.
Another remedy upon receiving a statutory demand is to reach a full and final settlement. However, it is always important to bear in mind voidable transactions when dealing with an insolvent company. A payment from a third party or the director or a personal guarantee are wise.
How to serve a statutory demand
A statutory demand to qualify as being served on the company either must be delivered to a person named as a director on the New Zealand Companies register, to an employee of the company at the company's head office or principal place of business, be left at the company's registered office or address of service, and in accordance with directions as to service by the Court, or in accordance with any agreement made with the company. It is recommended that the document is served by a document server. The service of a statutory demand by facsimile cannot be relied upon.
Disputing a statutory demand
If a debtor can show that a defence or a counter claim or a set-off equal to the amount claimed in the demand exists, not only will a demand be set aside but the aggrieved creditor will be ordered to pay the debtor's costs and will be no closer to collecting the debt.
A Court may set aside a statutory demand if the application is made within 10 working days of the date of service of the demand and the application was served on the creditor within 10 working days of the date of service of the demand. The Court may grant an application to set aside the statutory demand if it is satisfied that there is a substantial dispute, whether or not the debt is owing or is due, or the company appears to have a counter claim, set-off, or cross demand and the amount specified in the demand, less the amount of the counter claim, set-off or cross demand is less than the prescribed amount or the demand not to be set aside on other grounds.
A demand will not be set aside by reason only of a defect or irregulatory unless the Court considers that substantial and injustice would be caused if it were not set aside. Under section 291 of the Companies Act 1993, if a Court is satisfied that there is a debt due by the company to the creditor that is not subject to a substantial dispute, or is not subject to a counter claim, or set off, or cross demand, the Court may order the company to pay the debt within a specified period and that in default of payment, the creditor may make an application to put the company into liquidation, or dismiss the application and make an order putting the company into liquidation on the grounds that the company is unable to pay its debts.
The service of a statutory demand process can give great leverage to get paid quickly, however if a debt is disputed or the company that owes the money is not in financial difficulty the process is used at your own peril.
Record numbers of New Zealanders continue to leave permanently for Australia, almost 54,000 in 2012 alone. While most of those departing leave in search of higher incomes and warmer weather, some leave to escape their financial responsibilities, whether this is child support, a student loan or a liability under a personal guarantee. Correspondingly, often there are no assets left in New Zealand for the creditor to recover.
So, is it really as simple as purchasing a plane ticket to Australia to walk away from debts?
This common tactic has become such a concern for the Inland Revenue Department, who administers the student loan scheme, that new sanctions allowing the arrest of overseas based defaulters at the border were announced in the last budget. There are, however, some relatively simple and straightforward recovery solutions available to creditors under the Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 which do not require the power of arrest (although we expect that creditors would still appreciate this), and allow a creditor to continue recovery action that has already commenced in New Zealand.
For example, if a creditor has obtained a High Court judgment against a delinquent debtor for the provision of goods and services (including guarantees) in New Zealand, they can utilise the following procedure to obtain the benefit of a judgment enforceable across both sides of the Tasman, for a cost of as little as $2,000 (subject to certain conditions):
1. Register the judgment with the Australian Courts within 6 years of the judgment being awarded; and
2. Serve notice of the registration upon the delinquent debtor within 15 working days of registration.
Using free and cheap tools to track debtors
There are also a number of cheap and free tools available to creditors that allow a debtor's financial position to be reviewed. These include basic internet searches (eg. Google, LinkedIn, ASIC directorship and shareholder registers) to confirm employment, land title searches to confirm home ownership, and carrying out an Australian credit and financial check (including searches of Court websites and land title registers).
It should also be noted that by simply tracing and querying the now Australian based debtor on their repayment plans, often a financial solution can be obtained. Most debtors will accept the situation if you locate them. The vast majority of people are willing to pay something rather than go bankrupt.
Debts are enforceable across borders, and it is a false assumption that once a debtor leaves New Zealand, it is too expensive and complicated to chase them.
McDonald Vague has considerable experience in advising lenders and companies that are owed money on the options available to them. We also have the experience of gaining the best possible results for our clients. If you require assistance or have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Murray Matthews, Insolvency Accountant
This article is intended to provide general information and should not be construed as advice of any kind. Parties who require clarification on issues raised in this article should take their own advice.