We are due for the October OCR announcement to come out this week with pundits predicting that we may see a 50pt drop given the current state of the economy. However, we won’t have the CPI and inflation figures available for public release for another few weeks/months so at this stage the OCR decision could conceivable go either way (hold or drop)
In insolvency news, I understand we saw the first Licenced Insolvency Practitioner lose their license following a CAANZ disciplinary tribunal hearing for a number of breaches including misconduct, conduct unbecoming, Rules and Code breaches in insolvency engagements and non-response to NZICA. The full decision can be found here.
September came in just behind the August highs, given the closeness between the two the drop is negligible. This total was driven by continued strong application numbers from the IRD making up 77 of the 116 applications slightly down on the 87 the advertised last month. We expect this drive from IRD and all other creditors to continue into the last quarter of the year in a race to collect funds before the courts close.
The year-to-date applications (845) is only just behind the 2023 full year figures (864). 2020, 2021 and 2022 are specks in the rearview mirror compared to 2024 (total year winding up applications 2020 (239), 2021 (562) and 2022 (623).
While there has been a small drop in IRD application in September as at the date of writing (03/10/2024) they have already advertised 12 appointments for October, on that basis I wouldn’t read to much into the drop, it is likely just a case of how they numbers fell either side of month end. We are expecting them to continue chasing debtors hard into the Christmas closedown and new year.
September saw 5 more personal receiverships, a total of 43 for the past 12 months. Lenders who have taken personal general security agreements from borrowers continue to make appointments when borrowers and their companies default.
Why have we seen this increase in personal receiverships that historically was not the case, one of the reasons is likely the difficulty and time it takes to enforce personal guarantees while a personal general security agreement allows the lender almost immediate access on default to the borrowers assets.
The bulk of the receivership appointments continue to be driven by a small number of business lenders using these practises and exercising the enforcement rights the borrower granted them on signing up for the loan.
Both August and September 2024 have now surpassed the previous 7-year high seen earlier this year in March. While August highs were driven by a large government led Du Val Group appointment of 65 entities, September has exceeded expectations with minimal large group appointments.
Of interest for the month as at the time of writing (03/10/24) the Official Assignee had taken 68 of the 297 appointments (to 27/09/2024) there will likely be a few more that get included in the figures as late appointments get advertised in the next few weeks and will be reflected in the October article.
What is noticeable is that 65 of the 68 appointments came from the IRD. The next few points are perhaps something that only those in the industry can appreciate and fully understand, I will try set them out as best I can:
1. Almost none of the 68 appointments would have been groups of companies so there would be minimal duplication of correspondence and the usual shortcuts available with group appointments (similar directors/services etc). This is 68 individual companies that need to be administered and investigated.
2. In a court appointment you start with almost no information other than what the applicant creditors can provide you (the IRD is very strict with what they can provide due to personal privacy reasons). You are effectively starting blind.
3. Because you start with no/minimal information the appointment takes a huge amount of resources upfront to:
a. locate the director/shareholders (phone, email, social media, post)
b. find other creditors
c. identify and realise assets
d. conduct an investigation where the books and records are not easily accessible
e. conduct site visits
f. chase up dead ends
g. establish if the company was trading
h. establish what the company did, why it closed down and what happened to its assets
4. there is a large downstream burden on information providers getting inundated with requests for information where the OA has to do a wide sweep for information as they don’t know where services are held and who the professional advisors are (i.e. Xero, MYOB, Banks, Customs, ACC, NZTA requesting potential access details)
5. there is no upfront fee and in a lot of cases if there are no easily realisable assets the OA may exercise their powers under section 254 of the Companies Act 1993 to take no further action.
There may be other points I have missed; these are just the ones that come immediately to mind while writing.
Total insolvency appointments for the year continue to track up in line with 2015/2016 figures. The year to date is 33%+ up on 2024. Month on month September had 297 total appointments, 136 appointments above the long-term average of 161 and past September’s (2023: 169, 2022: 139, 2021: 118, 2020: 108, 2019: 206, 2018: 183, 2017: 185)). With 2065 appointments in the year to date we are above full year figures back to 2018. We expect the higher insolvency appointment levels will continue into 2025 at least due to a large backlog at IRD and a struggling economy in most sectors.
Solvent liquidations are almost half their long-term average, this loss has been picked up as a percentage equally by insolvent shareholder appointments and insolvent court appointments which in the below graph make up 86% of appointments. The long-term average for the two sectors has traditionally been around 75%.
As at the date of writing the August personal insolvency figures had not been released by the Insolvency and Trustee Service, no doubt everyone in the OA’s office is too busy keeping up with the huge workload they are now experiencing. As such, I have not updated these graphs and have kept last months paragraph as it remains correct and relevant.
In simple terms personal insolvency appointment figures for Bankruptcy, NAP and DRO remain low for the year to date in line with the very low levels seen over the last two years.
As bankruptcy is lagging indicator for the economy, we won’t see the lift in figures till after the fact, however the economy remains in a bit of a tough spot. From inflation, increasing costs of living (food, power, transport etc.), higher interest rates and other expenses, at some point individuals will run out of options and ways out. The latest drop in the OCR is unlikely to make a huge difference as it will take 12 – 18 months to take effect and will only drop certain costs, the price of goods we need day to day won’t go back down to pre-2020 levels.
While we are expecting to see corporate insolvencies continuing to grow into next year, I don’t believe we will see a lift in personal insolvencies till early 2025. There is traditionally a slow down over Christmas and January, then as people return to work and have to deal with the Christmas overspend, this may be when we see a lift in personal insolvency figures.
The signs continue to point to the NZ economy being in for continued pain for the foreseeable future, it is likely to get worse before it gets better regardless of the potential OCR decrease. We foresee continued rising appointments when compared to prior years. Inflation continues to be above the target of 1-3% and may be for some time with non-tradable inflation refusing to come under control.
If you want to have a chat about any points raised or an issue you may have you can call on 0800 30 30 34 or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
When a business encounters cash flow difficulties and an excessive debt burden, it is important to navigate these challenges carefully. Trading while insolvent not only jeopardises the future of your business but also exposes you to legal exposure. Here are several actions to avoid and some proactive solutions to consider.
o Avoid prioritizing payments to unsecured creditors and suppliers who have personal guarantees. This practice can be deemed as giving unfair preference, which can deemed voidable and can be reversed by a liquidator and/or court if the company enters liquidation. It is essential to treat all suppliers fairly and equally to avoid legal repercussions.
o Do not increase your debt burden by taking on more credit card debt or extending your trade accounts. This can worsen your financial situation and create a false sense of security. Instead, focus on reducing expenses and finding ways to increase revenue without accruing additional debt.
o Refrain from taking deposits from customers if you know you cannot meet the commitment. This can be found to be a breach of a directors duties. This practice is considered fraudulent trading and can lead to severe legal consequences. Always be transparent with your customers about your capacity to deliver.
o Avoid repaying intercompany debts, related party debt or unsecured shareholder loans over other creditors. This can be seen as preferential treatment and can be challenged by liquidators and in court during insolvency proceedings. Ensure all creditor payments are handled impartially and consider the entitlement of creditors (secured/preferential/unsecured).
o Do not disregard the entitlements of creditors. Secured, unsecured, and preferential creditors have specific rights under the seventh schedule of the Companies Act 1993 that need to be respected. Ignoring these entitlements can lead to legal actions and further financial complications.
Trading while insolvent can have serious implications:
• Legal Risks: Directors may face personal liability for the company's debts if found guilty of wrongful or fraudulent trading.
• Reputational Damage: Insolvency proceedings can harm your business's reputation, making it harder to rebuild trust with suppliers, customers, and investors.
• Financial Penalties: Insolvent trading can result in seeking contributions from directors and in severe cases or repeat cases, disqualification from acting as a director.
1. Debt Management:
o Negotiate with Creditors: Open lines of communication with your creditors to renegotiate payment terms. Many creditors would prefer to work out a repayment plan than see your business go under. Consider a company compromise under the Companies Act 1993 to gain time to pay and possibly some relief (with requisite creditor approval).
o Debt Restructuring: Consider restructuring your debt to extend payment periods, reduce interest rates, or convert debt into equity.
2. Inventory Control:
o Optimize Inventory Levels: Implement inventory management systems to avoid overstocking or stockouts (short on key stock items). This can free up cash tied in inventory and reduce storage costs.
o Just-In-Time (JIT) Inventory: consider adopting JIT inventory practices to minimize holding costs and reduce waste.
3. Invoice Management:
o Speed Up Collections: Implement strict credit control policies to ensure timely collection of receivables. Consider offering early payment discounts to encourage quicker payments from customers.
o Factoring and Invoice Financing: Use factoring or invoice financing to get immediate cash flow by selling your receivables to a third party.
o Issue your invoices in a timely manner
4. Cost Reduction:
o Cut Non-Essential Expenses: Review your expenses and cut non-essential costs. Focus on maintaining expenditures that directly contribute to revenue generation.
o Outsource Non-Core Functions: Consider outsourcing non-core business functions to reduce overhead costs.
5. Increase Revenue:
o Diversify Income Streams: Explore new markets, products, or services to increase revenue. Diversifying can help cushion against downturns in specific areas of your business.
o Boost Marketing Efforts: Increase your marketing efforts to attract new customers and retain existing ones. A targeted marketing strategy can lead to higher sales and improved cash flow.
Facing cash flow difficulties and an excessive debt burden can be overwhelming. However, by avoiding the pitfalls of preferential payments, increasing debt exposure, and trading insolvently, you can protect your business from legal and financial troubles. Implementing proactive solutions such as debt management, inventory control, and invoice management can help stabilize your business and pave the way for recovery. There are also options to discuss with an insolvency practitioner that can help save a viable business such as voluntary administration and company compromise. Always seek professional advice to navigate these challenges effectively and ensure compliance with legal obligations.
In our 44th Insolvency by the Numbers, we look at the July 2024 data set and we review how the month has tracked compared to prior months and years.
Unsurprisingly the Reserve Banks made no change to the OCR at their July 2024 announcement. Banks and independent economists now expect the first drop may come in November 2024.
June quarter inflation figures came in at 0.4, bringing the annual inflation rate to 3.3. This was driven largely by tradable inflation coming down, non-tradeable (“domestic”) inflation appears to be a bit stickier however. No doubt the next quarter inflation figures may not show as much of a drop with the recent rates rises pushing through and the adjustment to tax bands giving taxpayers a little more disposable income.
Real Estate agents are now pushing the narrative that now is the best time to get in and buy as it remains a buyers’ market. No doubt we will be looking back in the years to come thinking 2024 was perhaps the missed opportunity for some who wished they had brought then rather than waiting for the bottom, which we can often only spot in hindsight.